Skip to main content
§ Product

LP Reporting Engine

An automated reporting pipeline — calculates IRR / MOIC / DPI / TVPI per vehicle, generates per-LP report PDFs in each LP's preferred format, populates LP portals via API where available, produces ILPA-template-compliant ESG reports, and exports K-1 / 1099 XML for the year-end tax cycle.

Engagement
10–16 week build · ongoing reporting cycle
Built for
Finance teams · IR teams · CFOs
§ Problem

Quarterly LP reporting consumes the finance team for two weeks every quarter — calculating IRR and MOIC across vehicles, generating per-LP PDFs in each LP's preferred format, populating portal templates, then K-1 and 1099 XML exports at year-end. The work is mechanical, and the finance team would rather spend the time on anything else.

What this is

An automated LP reporting pipeline for the boring half of fund operations — the mechanical work the finance team would gladly hand off. Four planes:

  • Performance calculation. IRR, MOIC, DPI, TVPI per vehicle, per LP, per share class. Audited against the fund-accounting system's source of record.
  • Document generation. Per-LP PDFs in each LP's preferred format, parameterized for layout, branding, and disclosure requirements. ILPA-template-compliant where the LP requires it.
  • Portal population. API integration where the LP's portal supports it; file-drop or email delivery otherwise. Audit trail on every push.
  • Tax export. K-1 and 1099 XML in IRS-compliant XBRL / XML. Schema-validated before submission.

How it's built

Postgres for the calculation layer, dbt for the transformation logic, reportlab or weasyprint for PDF generation, requests-class pipelines for portal APIs. Tax-export layer uses the IRS published schemas with our own schema-validation tooling. Audit trail in append-only event log.

What you get

  • The performance-calculation pipeline, audited against fund-accounting source.
  • The per-LP template library, parameterized.
  • The portal-push pipeline with audit trail.
  • The K-1 / 1099 XML exporter, validated against IRS schema.
  • Ongoing reporting-cycle support — quarterly and year-end.
§ How we engage

Engagement is shape, not list.

Length and price are functions of the data and the destination. The shape below is the typical engagement.

Length
10–16 week build · ongoing reporting cycle

Scoped during the discovery call against the actual data and the operation it integrates with.

Lead
Bogdan

Principal engineer. Architecture and most code ships through one keyboard.

Cadence
Async, weekly

Written updates between, calls when the decision needs the room.

Bar
Production

Async correctness, capacity under burst, observability at every boundary.

§ Questions

What buyers ask about this one.

  • We use AtlasFive for fund accounting. Does this replace it?

    No — it sits on top. AtlasFive (or your preferred fund-accounting system) remains the system of record. This pipeline reads from it, applies the LP-specific reporting transformations, generates the deliverables, and pushes to portals. Same pattern works with Investran, eFront, or whatever your firm uses.

  • What's the K-1 / 1099 XML piece?

    The IRS XBRL / XML export formats for K-1 and 1099. The piece nobody enjoys building because the schemas are unforgiving and the tax cycle has hard deadlines. We build the export, validate it against the IRS schema, and integrate it with your fund-accounting system's tax workpaper output.

  • How do you handle the custom LP formats?

    Each LP has their own template — quarterly summary in a specific layout, capital-call notice in a specific format, certain calculations presented in certain ways. We build the per-LP template library, parameterized so when the LP requests a small change it's a config update, not a rebuild. The library compounds — engagement N covers the formats encountered to date, future LPs reuse or extend.

  • What's the audit-trail story?

    Every output is traceable: which fund-accounting snapshot produced which calculation, which template version generated which PDF, when each portal push happened. Auditors get a clean trail; LPs get versioned documents.

  • Pricing?

    Scoped to vehicle count, LP base size, and the breadth of custom-format requirements. Discovery call covers all three.

§ The next step

If the deliverable matches the gap, the next step is one call.

We'll scope length and price against your data and the operation it integrates with. No retainer, no fishing.

Bogdan and team · async-first · OP—2026